当前位置: > 站长相关 > vps简单评测之HostKvm 日本KVM VPS 1G内存方案

vps简单评测之HostKvm 日本KVM VPS 1G内存方案

1、系统信息、带宽、I/O测试
CPU model : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
Number of cores : 2
CPU frequency : 2199.998 MHz
Total size of Disk : 20.0 GB (0.8 GB Used)
Total amount of Mem : 993 MB (29 MB Used)
Total amount of Swap : 254 MB (0 MB Used)
System uptime : 0 days 0 hour 1 min
Load average : 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
OS : CentOS 7.1.1503
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 3.10.0-229.1.2.el7.x86_64
Virt : kvm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I/O speed( 32M ) : 80.6 MB/s
I/O speed( 256M ) : 626 MB/s
I/O speed( 2G ) : 148 MB/s
Average I/O speed : 284.9 MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency
Normal Node 53.77 Mbit/s 68.25 Mbit/s 4.213 ms
Xiangyang CT 53.89 Mbit/s 56.28 Mbit/s 131.93 ms
Shanghai CT 56.68 Mbit/s 31.33 Mbit/s 86.681 ms
Chengdu CT 43.22 Mbit/s 29.63 Mbit/s 109.944 ms
Xi'an CU 49.91 Mbit/s 45.40 Mbit/s 103.874 ms
Shanghai CU 48.99 Mbit/s 52.70 Mbit/s 57.012 ms
Chongqing CU 54.95 Mbit/s 46.21 Mbit/s 98.338 ms
Xi'an CM 65.24 Mbit/s 63.42 Mbit/s 63.974 ms
Shanghai CM 2.86 Mbit/s 3.66 Mbit/s 929.575 ms
Chengdu CM 11.72 Mbit/s 23.67 Mbit/s 221.691 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total time : 5 min 33 sec
Current time : 2018-06-010 09:51:59
Finished!

2、上传/下载带宽测试
Retrieving speedtest.net server list...
Selecting best server based on ping...
Hosted by OPEN Project (via 20G SINET) (Tokyo) [5.41 km]: 4.987 ms
Testing download speed...................................
Download: 68.56 Mbit/s
Testing upload speed.....................................
Upload: 59.83 Mbit/s

3、国内访问速度
vps简单评测之HostKvm 日本KVM VPS 1G内存方案

4、硬盘 I/O 性能测试
dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 9.29619 s, 28.9 MB/s

5、UnixBench跑分
Benchmark Run: Sat Jun 09 2018 04:34:39 - 05:02:49
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 22467516.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 2833.4 MWIPS (9.6 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 1813.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 589925.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 170649.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1552900.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1094229.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 206124.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 4272.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4289.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1026.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1609323.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 22467516.3 1925.2
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2833.4 515.2
Execl Throughput 43.0 1813.2 421.7
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 589925.9 1489.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 170649.9 1031.1
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1552900.6 2677.4
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1094229.1 879.6
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 206124.9 515.3
Process Creation 126.0 4272.5 339.1
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4289.1 1011.6
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1026.0 1710.0
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1609323.3 1072.9
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 942.4

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sat Jun 09 2018 05:02:49 - 05:31:06
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 45699369.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 5611.9 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 5829.6 lps (29.7 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 808160.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 223948.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2431860.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 2177843.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 396867.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 15314.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 7744.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1085.7 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 2602131.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 45699369.7 3916.0
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 5611.9 1020.4
Execl Throughput 43.0 5829.6 1355.7
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 808160.5 2040.8
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 223948.8 1353.2
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2431860.8 4192.9
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2177843.1 1750.7
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 396867.3 992.2
Process Creation 126.0 15314.3 1215.4
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 7744.1 1826.4
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1085.7 1809.6
System Call Overhead 15000.0 2602131.7 1734.8
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1737.9

6、路由追踪
电信
vps简单评测之HostKvm 日本KVM VPS 1G内存方案

联通
vps简单评测之HostKvm 日本KVM VPS 1G内存方案
vps简单评测之HostKvm 日本KVM VPS 1G内存方案

移动
vps简单评测之HostKvm 日本KVM VPS 1G内存方案
vps简单评测之HostKvm 日本KVM VPS 1G内存方案

7、Youtube速度测试

vps简单评测之HostKvm 日本KVM VPS 1G内存方案

vps简单评测之HostKvm 日本KVM VPS 1G内存方案:等您坐沙发呢!

发表评论

表情
还能输入210个字